Key Point: Possible fetal damage from ultrasound within approved exposure range.

Reassessment of Teratogenic Risk from Antenatal Ultrasound

Emily L. Williams (Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology) and Manuel F. Casanova (Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences), University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky. Translational Neuroscience 4(1), 2013 pp 81-87. DOI: 10.2478/s13380-013-0112-7.

Antenatal Ultrasound Risks (link to complete document)


Science has shown that risk of cavitation and hyperthermia following prenatal ultrasound exposure is relatively negligible provided intensity, frequency, duration of exposure, and total numbers of exposures are safely limited. However, noncavitational mechanisms have been poorly studied and occur within what are currently considered “safe” levels of exposure. To date, the teratogenic capacity of noncavitational effectors are largely unknown, although studies have shown that different forms of ultrasound-induced hydraulic forces and pressures can alter membrane fluidity, proliferation, and expression of inflammatory and repair markers. Loose regulations, poor end user training, and unreliable ultrasound equipment may also increase the likelihood of cavitation and hyperthermia during prenatal exposure with prolonged durations and increased intensities. The literature suggests a need for tighter regulations on the use of ultrasound and further studies into its teratogenicity.